Find a Lawyer

RAB NAWAZ versus STATE

Defining the section 302 (b) (c) evidence, the reduction in the prosecution's case reopened the testimony of the two witnesses of the prosecution who were the brother of the victim. The fact that one of the prosecution's witnesses suffered injuries would not be enough to accept their statement as good news. True, but the evidence presented by them should be examined in the circumstances given in the case, as the evidence presented by other witnesses states that the prosecution's witnesses were suffering from serious illness and were not reliable medical evidence and There was a dispute between the ocular evidence that led to the accusation. That he murdered the deceased after being held in objectionable position in his house, late and furious, and on his arrest the next day, Syed's request was made by the accused. The case, but the trial court failed to bring such an appeal to the accused, showed that it was a premature homicide. The accused's statement was to be accepted as the whole offense of the accused was replaced with the offense under section 302 (b), 302 (c), PPC under PPC and sentenced accordingly. The accused, in the negative and by the trial court, did not confirm the death sentence lawer from fb area from Machh lawyer