Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE

Sections 10 and 11 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 452 and 506 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Complaint abduction of the complainant who was the daughter of the complainant, entered her grandfather with free will and consent. And the marriage registrar was legally registered with the magistrate No inquiry was made by a police officer on the alleged incident No complaint was made by the complainant of the matter - Police complaint filed with delay of about 6-6 days And said that despite the fact that no extraordinary delay was explained, the suspects were armed with pistols, knives and poles. A single injury could not be tolerated by the complainant, which seems to be the result of animosity between the parties because the alleged abductor had entered into a marriage agreement with the accused by his own free consent, which the complainant provoked. ? The complainant was initially used to file a case under the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, but was terminated on the basis of the alleged abduction statement under section 164, CC P filed the complaint and stated that the legal action on the basis of the complaint is pending without legal action. The complaint filed by the complainant under Sections 452 and 506, the PPC before the Civil Judge / Judicial Magistrate, was dismissed, under the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n us immigration advocates from Kotli lawyer