Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR RANA versus MANAGER, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN

Sections 9 and 10 were on the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XIV, R2 Kanon S. Ha (10 of 1984), Article 133 suit for declaration, permanent injunction and leave of damages, no preliminary injunction restriction To reject this case on the basis of the objections filed by the Bank in its written statement, the competent defendant in its present form, after service, will not be entitled to defend the case nor the written statement rights. Will be allowed to submit in accordance with the claim in the present case, to be discharged from the court by filing a leave request from the bank, unless it receives After getting off to defend the subway can enter a written statement, the bank because of such failure, instead Banking Court can not constitute a communication apparatus based on the suit. Upon receipt of a written statement from the bank, the plaintiff should have been required to present evidence in support of his claim because he could not immediately approve such a litigation order. F The decision to retain the case was not a black decision without the plaintiff's proof that the High Court accepted the appeal and after dismissing the plaintiff after demanding the plaintiff, the new case was dismissed. With a directive to the Banking Court to decide, the decision was adjourned. Providing an opportunity for the bank to examine its claim and the testimony of the plaintiff's witnesses and the admissibility and authenticity of the documents, if any, to be presented by the plaintiff; but the bank, for such failure, to provide evidence Or the right to submit a document best advocate from Ghazi lawyer