Find a Lawyer

AKBAR ALI ALIAS SAHIB versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Definition of Evidence Both the complainant and the prosecution's other witnesses who had opened the prosecutor's academic account, explained the details of the incident and both agreed on the time, place and location, because of the night incident. The complainant, whose house the prisoner was in, was a natural occurrence at the relevant time. The other prosecutor's witness, who was the cousin of the complainant, also stated the reason for his presence on the occasion, the second witness of the prosecutor, who The deceased was a relative, his presence on the occasion could not be suspected at the relevant time, it seems that the prosecution's witness was the witness of the incident. There was an inaccurate witness whose FIR was filed very swiftly, and such a promptly filed FIR could confirm its creator, in which his attacker's name was taken, the weapon. Well, his name was included. Because of the eyewitness testimony and the sole accused of the incident, there is no chance of the accused being the real culprit. Due to the night's incident, the innocent person was light bulbs at the relevant time. Before witnesses were credible witnesses, there was no unlawful desire or enmity against the witnesses' accused. The firing of the accused was fully established in the incident which resulted in his injuries and resulting in his death. The medical evidence was in accordance with the healing account and was said to be fully elongated at the time of his medical examination. There was no contradiction in the medical account and the medical evidence was also fully elongated with the acular account. Two sets of prosecution evidence were in favor of the crime law firms from Quaidabad lawyer