Find a Lawyer

SH. MEHDI HASSAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 10, in favor of appellant-proof appellant, transferred the property before the auctioneer's termination auction, stating that he had purchased the disputed property at auction and that it was not available for transfer to another person. There was a record of settlement. Not Available There was no evidence of payment of auction and sale price by the appellant for verification of some part of the auction of this property and the price sold by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner, even the book of compensation. Could not be found on the basis of the existence of the documents on which the appellant asserted his claim that the effect of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner's response to the appellant's notice in the notice would not be sufficient to substantiate his claim. In the absence of evidence, the Supreme Court denied. The record to accept that the Deputy Settlement Commissioner's endorsement was actually based and he represented the correct position. Appellant could not bring any proof in a valid sale record to issue a transfer order Property moved before the repeal of the Act rules and was not available for transfer Appeal dismissed when you need a advocate from Punch lawyer