Find a Lawyer

MESSRS MUHAMMAD TRADING CO., LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 154 and 59 (1) of the General Clause Act (XX of 1897), the establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XVX of 2000), Section 2 (3) of the CBR Circular No. 7, 2002 Notice self-diagnosis service. The Scheme Service of the Short Document Notice on Employee Assessment states that the service of short document notice on the employee is not correct as any notice should be served in accordance with the provisions of Section 154 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The General Clauses Act, 1897, which was not considered to serve notice on the Department of Employees, has been requested that the notice was presented to the receiving employee who had received the notice on earlier occasions, the legitimate service of any notice. The income should be in accordance with the provisions of section 154. Tax Ordinance, 1979, under which provisions no person was allowed to take notice, which is not authorized by any of the Asisi, the department has failed to receive any notice. E stated that the employee should be referred to the complainant / evaluator. Option to receive notice from, short document notice service was terminated and order to exclude withdrawal from the self-assessed scheme without super-structure and non-jurisdictional notice service should be banned. ? The provisions of Sections 2 (3) (i) (a), 2 (3) (i) (b) and 2 (3) (ii) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 were proved beyond any shadow. Doubts due to incompetence, ineligibility and ineligibility in the performance of the department failed to prove the tax officer's actions and for the right reasons the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that under Section 122A of the Income Tax Commissioner Income. Take action from In accordance with the Tax Ordinance, 2001, of the law advocates from Bewal lawyer