Find a Lawyer

AKBAR KHAN versus STATE

Definitions of Articles 4 32 34 and App 34 Evidence Defendant's affirmative action According to the prosecution's witness statements, the accused opened fire 20/25, but none of the weapons were recovered from the scene. The complainant was fired at a speed of 6/7, but the doctor did not find any external injury to the person by the complainant, in which case he was injured by a wandering bullet or that he was over 100. Was fired from a distance. Nor can it be said that the incident described in the manner described by the prosecution did not rely on the testimony of the prosecution witnesses in view of the contradictory motions set forth in the FIR and the documents filed by the court doctor. It may have been, who medically examined the complainant, had never appeared in court to testify to the accuracy of the Medico legal report The trial court also appears to have handled this aspect of the matter with his mind and eyes. Left behind. It was closed, allowing the preparation of secondary evidence to cite the Meadow Legal reports, in which case it would be inevitable that if witnesses were presented, they would have gone against the prosecutor. Maintaining the conviction of the accused was not safe when it was not specified who opened fire. The complainant and no other supporting evidence was present to justify the culpability of any of the accused. The vacancy from the premises and the absence of blood stains was another case in which the evidence against a given background of the case against the fact of the prosecution's testimony is also present. The record is not reliable and dependable, power of attorney advocate Malakand lawyer