MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Sections 9 and 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O IX, R 8 The date for the dismissal of the suit was not set by the lender to file a lawsuit against the financial institution, and for illegal prosecution on the same date. Was excluded when it was set to respond. The application for leave to appear in the suit and to the defense in which the leave to appear for the exhibition and the response to the defense application was decided was not a hearing that was not a hearing date for the hearing. The banking court proceeded to dismiss the case when the legal case was completely disappeared, the banking court made legal errors, while deciding to submit a response to the leave submission and request for defense. The order was approved by the banking court was not sustainable in law because of the same type of legal defect. I had to take court reinstated a lawsuit filed by the creditors and the court gave custody banking for good. The appeal was granted at NG's request to appear and defend the holiday
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
