Find a Lawyer

HAJI ABDUL WAHID versus WAPDA

Sections 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 Land Acquisition Determined Amount of Land The Land Acquisition Collector classified the acquired land into four categories and accordingly the fixed amount of compensation is not satisfied by the amount of landlords. The matter was therefore fixed and the petition filed and the matter referred to the judge. Judge referee court increased compensation amount in several cases to determine the amount, but still is not satisfied with the appeal filed and the department has also appealed against the increase in compensation amount. And the orders passed by the Judge Referee Court, showed that neither the Land Acquisition Collector nor the Judge Referee Court made the appropriate and appropriate compensation and that some of the land acquired was fit for commercial purposes. Located nearby and also fitted for residential purposes, the land taken from one seat was adjacent to the road report. The local commissioner subsequently recorded the spot inspection, which did not result from both sides, that the trial court should justify the consolidation of the evidence as it was sufficient and sufficient, both by the Land Acquisition Collector. And the judge referee court did not properly evaluate the evidence on record when determining the compensation amount. , The fixed amount of compensation in which all the facts on the record are taken into account and accordingly the receipt of compensation and the necessary acquisition of compensation. law websites from Rahimyar Khan lawyer