Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM SHAMSI versus BASHIR AHMED MEMON

Section 10 shows a leave request to appeal to the court's record for the sale of assets of the company to the Official Assignee for direction of the company, when the second reference was made up to that time and the government official Was the highest bidder of the time and it was up to 21 2005 2005 or before the court on 4 December 2005 when the expectation of a higher bid was still made. Ordered to make a reference, another reference should be heard as well. 11 2005 Before the aforementioned hearing date of 2005, the objections were filed and the hearing was heard 11 11 Instead of shortening the hearing period from 2005 to 2005, the court heard all pending citations, petitions and objections for 3-5. Ordered to do 2005 Against its own determination, suddenly, the court began hearing an interim date, the third reference, on 18 May 2005, ignoring the second reference and unanimously passed the uncontested order, which was agreed by the said order. This was despite the fact that the formal Assignee was left at the mercy of the latter which had already been submitted for approval by the latter, otherwise the court had certainly given a second reference to the bidders. Such an order was violated, violating the basic principles, was not sustainable in law, application for leave of appeal before the Supreme Court was converted into appeal by the Supreme Court, the appeal was accepted and 18 2005 The order of the day was set aside and the case judge was on remand with the company. The second reference and the third decision directive are the parties' objections and assertions us immigration advocates from Balakot lawyer