BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE
The Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/504/147/148/149 bailiffs were allegedly fully armed in the gas house and fired on the prosecutor's testimony, which was mandatory. This did not mean that they had jointly signed the agreement. Separation of testimony from a deceased or other injured prosecutor with a joint intention with the accompanying accused is therefore not possible at this stage in connection with the murder of the accused and injury of the accused prosecutor on the theory of joint intent. The allegation is that the two accused fired at the prosecution witness who alleged that he had saved his life by hiding in the case of Charani against the accused, thus, it was not a firing incident, however, the accused. He did not repeat his firearm on the witness who was completely at his mercy and he, first of all, had no intention of killing him, was of a mental state and was really difficult to decide on the bail stage unless Unless compelling evidence is available. Further investigation into the crime of the accused was required for a positive deduction and they were admitted on bail under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Gilgit lawyer