Find a Lawyer

PUSHPA BAI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

R 4 The authority, without notice, inquiry or personal hearing, issued such order eight years after the appointment of a public servant, that his appointment letter during the inquiry was a forgery, which could be a forgery or a fake appointment letter. This is proved by the appointment of the appointing authority, by its forgery or by its affiliation or by manipulation of records or by any other conceivable manner, the department did not present any details or copy of the inquiry report. To say that a reinforcement / posting order was fake or fake, simply the simple word would have no legal authority for so long. Did not inquire about the authenticity / accuracy of the appointment order and was paying the public servant rather than dismissing the employee or dismissing the employee. The accusation will only be a clear irregularity by the Pay Prevention Authority IM. The unsafe action was not a legal / appropriate one, which led to the Justice Service Tribunal accepting the appeal due to a severe abortion and an inappropriate order. Was rejected while it was observed that the authority would be free to conduct regular investigations with it. Order after giving a public employee a hearing opportunity property advocates from Mithi lawyer