Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MAHI versus MANZOOR

Sections 302 (c), 324 and 34 of the testimony were complimented by the presence of a night-light which was allegedly observed in the light of a torch even though it was mentioned in the FIR, but never during the investigation. I was not taken in, not even the smelly land. During the interrogation, police never arrested the accused during the seizure as the accused had never been involved in the case since the beginning of the investigation, the accused was found innocent in five successive investigations conducted by various investigating officers. Even after two interrogations, one was later done, one under the DIG order and the other on the direction of the High Court, the accused were not found involved in the case of the Deputy Superintendent of Police as the court's testimony agrees. That he found the accused innocent during his investigation. , Like a weapon of crime, was recovered from either of the two charges. There is no doubt that one of the prosecutor's injured witnesses appeared, but because the prosecutor's witness was simply injured, he was declared a true witness. It was not enough to give the case if he was not convicted by other circumstances on record, then the five accused in the same seat were acquitted of the case and neither the state nor the complainant appealed against their fate. Prior to this, in the previous case, in view of the enmity between the parties regarding a murder, did not rely on statements from closely related witnesses. Could have been both involved in the eyewitness case. The deceased's sons and their statements remained unconfirmed by some independent evidence and thus, did not even acknowledge the truth. top advocates from Miran Shah lawyer