Find a Lawyer

STATE versus LIAQUAT HUSSAIN

Sections 302, 341, 109 and 34 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V 1898), Section 382B West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Definition of evidence and mitigating circumstances of the sentence as far as the accused's case is concerned A close trial of the trial court's contentious decision showed that, it was drawn from mere logical reasoning, it was well supported and supported by my assumptions and limitations, in the case of murder. Can't be considered as a controlling circumstance to be punished with less than a normal sentence; in the present case, he committed double murder, he charged the victim with a pistol. Do hunts and shoot at them one after the other, causing the deceased to fall to the ground and immediately die, while the other deceased went to the hospital with no injuries. The circumstances were not deserving of any kind of relaxation, and since the massacre of the murderers was a normal punishment, the justice would fulfill the end of the court of justice. The circumstances were truly horrible. And other convictions under Section 341, PPC and Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, also affirmed that the case of the co-accused was on different grounds. According to the lawsuit, one Llakara was convicted. The co-accused and no overt act was taken with him, the co-accused, who was the father of the main accused, did not hurt any of the deceased or the prosecution witnesses. His mere presence and upbringing on this occasion was not sufficient to bring him to life imprisonment; under Section 302, 34, the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. power of attorney advocate Gujranwala lawyer