Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 392 and 114 bail, the grant of further investigation was made after dark and the FIR was filed with a delay of seven days, which states that the alleged crime The perpetrators of the crime cannot be identified. On the spot and the names of the complainants were disclosed to the complainant by the co-accused who informed the complainant that the accused was also among the persons who allegedly committed the crime, in any case The identification of the test was not paraded so that the accused could be positively impacted during the investigation. The CD-deck and a pistol were allegedly recovered from the possession of the suspects, but the recovered CD-deck was never identified by the complainant or witnesses, and the alleged pistol was recovered from the possession of the accused. There was nothing to record. It was allegedly made by a co-accused who had already entered into a pre-arrest bail after his arrest. The challan was already presented. Completion of the inquiry Continues to imprison the accused for any beneficial purpose. The accused had no bandits or robber credentials or any precedent in his account as no other case of the same nature was registered against him at the relevant police station. He was granted bail, demanding further investigation into his crime immigration advocates contact from Nowshero Feroz lawyer