IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, GUJRANWALA
Article 199 Applicability of the Constitution Retention Rule The applicant guaranteed an order approved by the Settlement Authority before the Board of Revenue refused to interfere with the order due to lack of jurisdiction Yes, the Accuracy Board of Revenue correctly observed that it had no jurisdiction. Understand that jurisdictional orders passed through settlement powers are arbitrary in the constitutional jurisdiction and those seeking equality must be present in the court with clear hands and be vigilant in their rights. Should. The Board of Revenue ordered on 16 4 2004, while the applicant had. The present petition was filed on 25th 2005, and, therefore, the constitutional petition was bound to be rejected on the principle of lounge. The High Court refused to interfere with the order passed by the Board of Revenue Petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
