Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DAD versus STATE

The complainant's suspicion of the value of Sections 324, 353 and 377D was found to be suspicious as the other three criminals opened fire on him which resulted in holes in his clothes. Medical officer's evidence revealed that the complainant's clothing. I could not find such holes, only an empty cartridge was safe from this place. To the extent that the incident and no other empty cartridges were stored, the complainant's statement was neither endorsed nor supported by any other evidence. The defendant's request was that the police arrest the real culprit. I couldn't, and he was falsely implicated in this case. Evidence from defense witnesses on the grounds of enmity revealed that no accused was present. At the time of the incident, both said that the witnesses were examined by the prosecution, but their statements persisted if any evidence was available. If not challenged on the other hand, it will be considered to be accepted by the party, at the present time such a concept can be substantially drawn. Two theories were available on record in the case, one for the prosecution and the other for the accused. If two theories emerge from the evidence, then the theory was favorable for the accused, the defense theory should be proved in this case, the prosecutor's case was fragmented and had to be dismissed, even in the case of the prosecutor's case very suspicious. , The accused was entitled to the benefit of the doubt, the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt us immigration advocates from Ghotki lawyer