Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus ZULFIQAR ALI

A XXXVII suit was ordered to recover the money and the property in dispute was linked to the execution and sale. During the execution process while the property was being sold, the applicant came up with an objection requesting that it could be owned by him. Not to be sold to the satisfaction of the decree as it was purchased on the basis of a purchase agreement for the purpose of the judgment which was complied with by the court and the High Court did not agree with the objection and the petitioner's request Was deleted The disputed property being subject to a civil suit could never be transferred during the civil suit's lawlessness and, if it was transferred at all, it was influenced by the principle of the lease pendente and thus by the petitioner. Property is considered to be well connected and sold to the satisfaction of the order, both courts did not appreciate the issue in its true legal context. o It is suspected that the defendant in this case had sold the property to the petitioner / petitioner, who had become his brother-in-law because of this suit, yet it cannot be declared as suit property nor in this case. Matter of All that remained was the amount involved in the matter, which could only be a matter of property, if the same was connected before the decision according to the provision of the CPC property, in the circumstances, it could never be subject to the title. Cannot be subject to This suit can neither be sold nor sold to the satisfaction of the judgment which is based on the principle of Lease London. law firms from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer