DR. AKMAL WALID versus STATE
Witness testimony to the facts stated in the grant of the Complainant Inspector, Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 212/216/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 11 N, 21 C & 21 J was not. The FIR and its source of information were the defendants themselves who disclosed these facts to them during their police custody. The evidence collected was not available. The Case Investigation Officer had not yet recorded any person's statement under Section 161, CRPC, to make the above record a part of the case. The entire case leaned on the evidence of the admissible witness, which the trial court had not yet examined with all these cases. The accused, who is yet to bring any evidence on record, was granted bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Fort Abbas lawyer
