The decision to delay the appeals of Sections 22 and 24 was passed on 22 9 2004 and certified copies were issued on 9 12 2004 while the appeal was filed on 8 1 2005 which means that 31 days after receipt of certified copies. An appeal was filed on The allegation that the application for copies was submitted on 22 9 2004 and not on 27 9 2004, no documentary evidence other than the affidavit was supported and that, through the appellant's counsel, the contents of the application Were right and there was nothing. The court should have furnished a copy of any documentary evidence or application which could indicate the date of receipt of the application and the probable date on which the copy was likely to be produced. There was no such documentary evidence. The appellant submitted that the delay of every single day was justified in contempt but in the present case there were merely statements or refusals, without any evidence which could not be relied upon by the appellant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
