Find a Lawyer

YASIN versus QADEEM SHAH

Sections 8, 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908); Section 115 claimants' possession, declaration and permanent injunction claim that the home was disposed of by the owner directly in the dispute to his father and that the defendants The members of the \ barber / barber \ community were the "neighbors" or tenants in the house. And was paying the plaintiff \ Torah \ and khakashura services (services names), but he later refused to pay, claiming that the suit was leased to him by his landlord. The defendant was living with the gift and the second defendant because of his specific services to the landlord because his tenant suit as well as the trial court and the Court of Appeal presented the plaintiff under oath and on record. They were substantiated by documentary evidence. While the suit case was not supported by any of the defendants' evidence or any other substantive material of the evidence presented by the defendants, both the trial court and the appellate court moved our traditional decision by the parties to the evidence of their own claims. In view of all the evidence I have presented, the defendants could not disclose any misunderstanding, misreading or over-reading of the evidence by both the courts and the defendants. The conclusions of unlawfulness or irregularities in the decisions and the concurrence of the following competent courts in questions cannot be interfered with by the High Court in exercising its amended jurisdiction. r \ n \ r \ n online advocate from Sudhnoti lawyer