Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus ABDUL WAHEED

Under Section 249A and 345 (2) of the Complaints Regulation (XLV of 1860), section 324/452 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the evidence during the proceedings of the re-proceeding proceedings, the accused under section 249A Application filed The CCP, on the ground that the complainant had compromised on the occasion of the arrest of the accused, was dismissed by the trial court because the complainant had no agreement before the trial court's order under the trial court. Did not The High Court, upheld by the High Court, correctly stated that under section 345 (2) CR PC, the offenses mentioned in the first two columns of the section, with the permission of the court, were before Any trial for the crime is pending, which will be structured by. The third column was dealt with during the hearing on a plea for bail before the arrest, when no legal action was taken against the crime. Concluding before the trial court could not constitute such a basis for the defendant's success because under section 454545 (?) CCPC, it was the trial court which had to satisfy itself and thereby commit the crime. Had to allow the gathering. The High Court had reasonable arguments and was fully in accordance with the law, which rejected the appeal of the Supreme Court to demand any intervention. lawer from fb area from Jalozai lawyer