Find a Lawyer

CUSTOMS APPEALS NOS.K-342 AND K-343 OF 2004, DECIDED ON 10TH JANUARY, 2005 versus CUSTOMS APPEALS NOS.K-342 AND K-343 OF 2004, DECIDED ON 10TH JANUARY, 2005

Sections 17, 19, 156 (1) (89) (194) of the importation of the vehicle through the sale of a foreign diplomat in the open market by the foreign diplomat and stated that the Federal Government Notification No. Section R506 (I) ) / 88 As of the provisions of dated 26 6 1988 the vehicle has been exempt from import duty. Under the notification, the diplomat said that although he was entitled to receive exemption from import duties on his imports during his stay in Pakistan, such imported goods were not able to be sold in the open market before five years had passed. The sale of such goods is valid before the expiry of the period, only after obtaining the necessary authorization from the competent authority that the notification vehicle was sold in the dispute without importation in the open market after its import. Without paying the necessary permission from the federal government and said that not even a straight vehicle is fake Representatives were registered in appellant's / buyer's names and consequently confiscated. The appellants claimed that they were clean buyers of the undercarriage and did not know that they were being sold on the same vehicle. Prayed for the release of Were not renewable or disposable except under the prior consent of the Federal Government except that the report stated that within two years of imports, the goods were not marketable in the open market, among them Nothing was done by the importer of these vehicles and they were sold. Will go wrong in the open market immigration advocates contact from Lakimarwat lawyer