Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHID versus STATE

Definition of section 2302 (b) of the evidence was unknown in the case, which was not named in the FIR, the testimony of the two accused before the accused before the accused is a criminal conviction, jointly confessable, confessional. Were not The witness of the recovery, which was a clear violation of section 103, was not direct evidence of the PC in which case the deceased's house was located in a thickly populated area and his brother's house adjacent to his house where the wall of the house was broken. Was given Eventually, at least someone in the FIR must have heard the voice of the prosecutor breaking the story, it wasn't that the household articles were looted and the house wall was broken, but the story in the FIR was That the wall of the house was broken and that the household articles were scattered in the house was evidence of the circumstances and that the evidence presented by the prosecution was not of the nature under which the convict and the accused were punished by the trial court. It can be retained, the trial court has given the accused the benefit of punishment, punishment and punishment, set aside and released from jail. Or. immigration advocates phone number from Arifwala lawyer