Find a Lawyer

RAMESH M. UDESHI versus STATE

Section 9 (a) (vi) / 10 Definition of proof was not shown by the accused in any kind of maneuver as it had made clear in his summary that although under the rules the underground land was not allowed by public auction. Had to be disposed of or private negotiations could ease the rules under the Chief Minister's Law and, in the past example, allowed conversion at the rate of Rs 50,000 per acre, depending on the legal opinion issued by the Ministry of Law. It may be that none of the prosecution's witnesses stated that the defendant personally benefited from changing the land acquired in favor of the co-accused, The government's acknowledgment that the accused was charged in situations that did not use its discretion in advising the Minister on this issue. Under Section 9 (a) (vi) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the lack of discretion or misinterpretation of any authority cannot be construed as a crime. GO which could give rise to administrative proceedings against the accused, no reasonable case was presented by the prosecution; the accused was not bound to prove his innocence. best advocate from Swabi lawyer