Find a Lawyer

MALIR CANTT. BOARD versus SYED TANVEER ALI

Section 56 Constitution Act (II of 1924), Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Route Permit, under the security of the Provincial Transport Authority jurisdiction Cantonment Area, the Cantonment Board appoints the defendant to be his coach in the Cantonment Area. Forced to run The route permit issued by the Provincial Transport Authority of the Cantonment Board was that in view of the security of the cantonment area, the defendants had to obtain separate licenses to enter the cantonment area; such process of the board in the constitutional application The respondent was arrested by the High Court. Allowed respondents did not challenge the cantonment board's authority to take necessary measures for security purposes and such action could always be taken, on the one hand, the cantonment board had requested security and The board, on the other hand, had tenders for it. The route on which the respondents' vehicles were operating was governed by the law, under the law's management, the Canton Mentor Board was authorized to assume the duties of the provincial transport authority, which was the authorized authority on transportation issues. Was properly issued and the board had no authority to stop the defendants' vehicles, which included the cantonment area within the territorial limits of the province. The incident was not brought to anything in which it was submitted that the Cantonment Board is legally eligible to revoke the provincial transport authority's action. The High Court refused to interfere in its decision. family advocate from Pindi bhohri lawyer