Find a Lawyer

SYED AQLEEM ABBASI JAFARI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Recovery of the amount deducted and embezzlement in the rank of criminal and departmental proceedings, after issuing and responding to the notice due to the employee, failing to take effect. Reduction in penalties and the recovery of embezzlement money were imposed, and the service tribunal offered by a civil servant also maintained that criminal action was also taken against him and regular inquiries were made. The idity service tribunal rightly observed that there was sufficient documentary evidence on record. For dealing with regular inquiries, there was a Clerk of the Government Employee Account who collected large sums of money from the bank and kept it in the chest in violation of the security rules; the public servant had the opportunity to defend himself before the inquiry committee. He could have been subpoenaed as well as criminal proceedings. Taken together and independently against the guilty officer, the collection of heavy money against another civil servant could not be handled by the police. The department officials had already dealt softly with the government employees, according to the service tribunal. The decision passed was not subject to any legal impediment so that no significant question of interference from the Supreme Court arises. Article 18 (12) (3) of the Constitution included the law of public importance. tax advocates from Phool nagar lawyer