Find a Lawyer

NOORUDDIN versus STATE

Section 497 (Enforcement of Jewish) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (2) / 17 (3) / 17 (4) grants of complaint, grievance complaint, after the incident, both went to the police station with the injured. , Informed the police of the incident, requested a letter to take the injured to the hospital and said that he would come and file a report later, there was such an entry in the station diary police. In this case, an FIR will be lodged with the Medical Officer for the investigation of the injured witnesses, so this will be the said station diary under which the complainant has given some details of the incident to the police, the names of the accused. No complaint was made in the station diary after. The injured persons should have been taken to the police station for full details of the incident, which could have been called a further statement, but they did not do so and remained silent for two days and then again they were detained. And given the details of the incident, which was covered in section 154, the delay in the CCP's two-day book was not explained; the complainant police did not explain the delay in recording the statements. Of the two injured witnesses who adversely affected the prosecutor's story that the accused accused of entering the hospital at the time of the incident, the trial could be considered at this time, but if he In the light of time, the same should be considered in the above facts and circumstances, the involvement of the accused in this case will be suspected, in the circumstances of the bail the accused was allowed. immigration advocates phone number from Khanewal lawyer