MUHAMMAD GULZAR versus STATE
Sections 230 b (b) /, 34, 4 32 i and 7 33ism f (i) The definition of evidence of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (a) (c) and (e), is alleged The prisoners, who were hearing the persons, were brought to the district courts. On public duty, who confessed before the trial court that he had injured all three killed and injured witnesses, the statement made by the accused under section 342 showed the CCP's most ridiculous, sensational and brutal manner. He had died. Against the recovery of the G3 rifle from the accused and the five offenses of the G3 rifle by chance, he was fully linked to the commission of the crime, which occurred on a broad day, the accused was abducted by the law for ten months. The motive of the incident was found by the accused in a work condition. Ocular testimony was proven through medical evidence as well as the recovery of offenses. There is no question of Ang's premeditated and mitigation question. In this case, the fate of the 11 co-accused was of no avail, especially when the state's appeal filed against him by the High Court was dismissed. Because the accused has been accused of not deserving of any kind of relaxation. Under the circumstances, the punishment and punishment of the accused were maintained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer