Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HABIB ADM LIMITED versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LIMITED


Articles 24 (2) and 26 (6) of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 42 and 54, the declaration and the permanent injunction dispute were raised in the suit which was demanded by the Electric Supply Company because the claimant. The demand for additional payment was disposed of under the provisions of Sections 24 (2) and 26 (6) of the Electricity Act 1910, the dispute referred to, the plaintiff had to submit to the present Electric Inspector. During that time the plaintiff company had to submit the present demand and the disputed amount was to be deposited in court within three days. The electric inspector was instructed to decide the dispute within three months, entitled to the money appeal provided under the Electricity Act. In 1910, the Electric Supply Company could not take any immediate action to recover the disputed amount until the decision was recorded by an electric inspector.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Mian Walli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.