MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL versus STATE
Sections 408 and 34 Financial Institutions (Restoration of Finance) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), Sections 5, 7 and 20 of the Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 403 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 26 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ), Article 199 Constitution Petition The termination of the disputed property of the FIR was under the assumption with the bank to repay the loan and remove it without its consent, under section 20 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance. The crime was established, the banking court had already admitted. The case and the same, irrespective of whether it was a civil obligation or the offender or both, reside exclusively under his jurisdiction, not only the filing of a case under the FIR filed against the applicants Was without authority and legal authority, but it was not necessary to prosecute the applicants in their pursuit. There is a double risk, which was not allowed under the law, the imported FIR was crushed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Warburton lawyer
