Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR HUSSAIN TALAT versus STATE

Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), section 2 (s) / 16/32 (1), (2) / 178/156 bail, accused, denied the accused charged with primary feces, under this section Was punished under 156 (1) (89). ) Of the Customs Act, 1969, which was neither listed in the FIR nor in the interim challan, did not result in any knowledge of any investigating officer or any court on the provisions of law. Will not be affected. Was charged with a crime not covered by the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), the CCP would normally have been released on bail, in the present case it was not applicable which fell under the category of white collar crime. The incidence of theft of state revenue was increasing at alarming rates and as a result no liberal view could be taken on the issue of bail, according to records it has been alleged that he has been involved in various crimes and as such. The trend had to stop, which is expected to affect the national economy, the bail was dropped. The accused in the circumstances power of attorney advocate Hub Chowki lawyer