Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD versus RIAZ-UD-DIN

Definitions of Articles 2 & 2 and Evidence of Evidence Two witnesses, from time to time during the trial, gave periodic, stable and natural calculations, despite the fact that no such material could be brought about. It can be said that it is linked to their credibility or the truth of the matter. He said that the witnesses were not witnesses on the occasion because they justified their presence on the occasion so that even an opportunistic and interested witness could present a true version and believed his testimony in a particular case. It is alleged that he could not make any suggestion. The hostility of the witnesses against whom it could be said that they had falsely implicated the accused in this case was in full harmony with the medical evidence prosecution case and the evidentiary witnesses were confirmed. And this was also rightfully received as an ocular testimony as a pistol controversy. Along with 30 bores, three live rounds and fixed chargers of the same bore, were recovered from his possession and the firearms expert's report was positive and the serologist's report was positive. Even if the confessional statement of the accused did not appear voluntarily, the prosecution had brought sufficient material. The record was used to link the accused to the crime that he was a job killer, but there was nothing in the record to support the fact that the motive behind the incident was that the death sentence against the accused was age. Turned into a prison sentence. In the interest of justice advocate for immigration from Kala Bagh lawyer