Find a Lawyer

AMANULLAH versus PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER ((IGP) PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 452 / 337A (ii) / 148/149 Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Section DPO and Section P (Investigation) in the change of constitutional inquiry. There were five police officers. According to Additional Inspector General of Police, Head of Investigation Punjab, the accused was declared wrong and innocent by Section P (Investigation) and he did not admit it and As a result, he considered the second investigation given by him as the first investigation. Investigation If the order of inquiry by the SP (Investigation) was inappropriate or some action was taken against them, it should be prosecuted and if he had wrongly or illegally admitted the matter. The accused could not be punished for which the police could not. To be allowed to take advantage of their own illegal and wrongdoing, if the complainant was not satisfied with the above five inquiries, he could be compensated by the inquiry by the Additional Inspector General of Police, Head of Investigation Punjab. Should also be relieved as the said Additional Inspector General should not be satisfied with the final inquiry given by the police, which would be appropriate and consistent. Article 18 (6) of the Police Order, 2002 by the Chief Inspector General of Police, Chief Investigation Punjab, was not satisfactory to pass the order for final inquiry and the Additional Advocate General, Punjab, also performed fairly. His dissatisfaction over the report was made to the provincial police officer (IGP) Punjab, so it was directed to make another inquiry into the interests of justice. female advocates from Thana Bula Khan lawyer