Find a Lawyer

SOHAIL AHMAD BAJWA THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ

In section 11, 5A, 4 and 13, the charge of converting residential property into non-residential property in question was legally a residential property that the tenant used for non-residential purpose, but required under section 11 Accordingly was not changed to non-resident. In the West Pakistan Citizen Rental Ordinance, in 1959, the landlord did not even say that the property owned was non-residential property, therefore, the rent increase after every three years, by 25%, was considered under Section 5A. was done. The Ordinance Appellate Court had no jurisdiction to raise the rent rate under the circumstances and to pay rent arrears to the landlord, when not before the Appellate Forum, in the matter of determining fair rent under Section 4, West Pakistan. Was. The Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, nor the appellate court's impugned order on the increase of rent on the basis of changing the property, could not be sustained by him and the High Court on appeal dismissed it. law firms from Ghotki lawyer