TAHIR ALIAS MALANG versus STATE
Sections 3, 14, 14B and 14C of the petitioner, who had been convicted and sentenced under Section 14 of the Foreign Act 1946, had already served his sentence on retaining his deportation. The main sentence was sentenced and he paid a fine. Was it that the court's observations on deportation were unnecessary under the provisions of section 14 of the Foreign Act 1946 and were not required in any case, as they were neither appealed to the court nor Only the applicant's deportation arrangement was related to the provision of 5% penalty of the Foreign Act 1946 and no other purpose including exile was provided, under the Federal Government, orders, generally or all non There can be no occasion with the owners or with respect to a particular one. Definition of foreign or practiced class or foreigners, restriction, regulation or restriction on their entry into Pa. Section 3 of the Foreign Law Act 1946, the departure or presence of, or presence in, the Judicial Magistrate / The court was not liable to proceed beyond the scope of section 14 of the Foreign Act, 1946; the unapproved judicial magistrate's inappropriate remarks and observations of the Judicial Magistrate were reversed and the High Court reversed the circumstances. Requested \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Hariwala lawyer