Find a Lawyer

RAEES AHMED THROUGH L.RS. versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY

The plaintiff for a section of 42 & Q 55 law evidence (of 1984 of the 10), Article Contract Contract Contract Act (IX 72 of 187272), section 25 suit for declaration and injunction from private party in a housing colony plaintiff. For which he referred to the Housing Authority. In his name, the transfer of the plot and the Housing Authority's record of the plaintiff complying with the formal procedures required for the purpose of transferring the plot stated that he had appeared with the plot dealer in the office of the authority and executed it. had gone. An acknowledgment was issued by the Housing Authority on a fixed date for the submission of the transfer order, confirming and verifying the required documents. That because of his illness he could not contact the Housing Authority's office to submit the transfer order in favor of the plot and that one of the private defendants illegally forged his signature and the other accused Had sold his plot by forgery. The housing authority's office filed a tiled request from Walleyt Housing Authority to collect the original exchange order and the buyer of the plot had a copy of the authorization letter intended to be signed by the official counter under the affidavit. The plaintiff denied that he had ever authorized the defendant to collect a transfer order and denied his signature on the authority letter. The immovable authority letter was taken on record and the court was ordered. That he should act like a body of evidence. For all exceptions, such a court order cannot be construed to imply that the contents of the author's letter female advocates from Qalandarabad lawyer