Find a Lawyer

FAQEER MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 497 filed by Pakistan Coast Guards Act (XVIII of 1973), Section 14 (1) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 8 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 6 Bell, Pakistan Coast Guards The denial of the R indicates that the suspect was arrested on suspicion of smuggling on a pre-espionage report at the railway station that the accused had been arrested by the Coast Guard Authority at the railway station at the railway station. There was no jurisdiction to seize the goods where the accused was arrested, not inside the Port Area. In accordance with the provisions of section 14 (1) of the Pakistan Coast Guards Act 1973, the jurisdiction of the Pakistan Coast Guards cannot be challenged on the basis of arrest and possession jurisdiction. Quantity drugs such as Hash Hashish, containing 74 packets and weighing a total of 78kg, were recovered, even if two packets of samples were sent to Camica. The test, ultimately due to the quantity contained in these two packets Punishment can be imposed because there is nothing in the Narcotic Material Stances Act, 1997 or the rules made under it. It was determined how much of the seized drug should be sent for this purpose. According to chemical analysis, a reasonable amount should be sent when 58 grams were sent from each packet as a sample. When each packet weighs approximately one kilogram, this would be sufficient in the case where the charge Was imposed, may be linked to the crime at trial. Trial filed by the accused for speedy disposal of the case immigration advocates email from Killa Abdullah lawyer