Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus STATE

Before the arrest of section 498 and 345 of the Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 380, the defendant denied the allegation, He was charged after scaling the wall. The complainant committed adultery with his daughter. He and his daughter (the victim) were hurt and forcibly snatched pieces of jewelry from the victim. It has been alleged that the parties have compromised and the complainant has also confirmed the accused's argument, in such case no agreement was allowed. Section 454545, as a CR PC, the crime of adultery was not only against the individual but it was also against the good conscience of the society and stated that the crime was not included in the list of crimes which was serious in the FIR. Nature was in charge. Nature and the defendant did not emphasize the grounds that were generally considered to give extraordinary concession on arrest bail, except that the complainant and his daughter had compromised with the accused, the seriousness of the crime. In view of this, the accused's bail was rejected online advocate from Ukba lawyer