ARIF ULLAH versus STATE
The testimony of Section 9 (c) evidence was proved by reliable and convincing prosecution evidence from the accused, however, no separate sample was taken from each of the 15 slabs recovered from the accused. It is certainly not possible to say how many slabs were in addition to the one in which the sample was actually contained in the prosecution, therefore, it failed to prove that the quantity of marijuana recovered exceeded one kilogram. Resulting in the conviction of the perpetrators of the crime, but the punishment was reduced economically under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Nowshero Feroz lawyer
