Find a Lawyer

MST. HAFEEZ BIBI versus STATE

Sections 392, 302, 394, 397, 337 I (b); 337 F (2) and 411 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980 The reviewer's argument for the AXXVI Supreme Court ruling was that the entire evidence record was not examined in its true context because the contradictions appearing in the eyewitness testimony were not properly appreciated. This defense version needs to be re-examined and that there was enmity between the petitioner's father and the local police, who escaped the notice of the court under the confession of the accused woman, but changed the sentence to death Was done. Prisoners with the benefit of Section 382B were present on the PC's unreliable evidence record to show that the applicant, as the complainant's maid, played an important role in the murder of the complainant's two minor children. What was more, the applicant wanted to discuss the matter again. The merit, which was not valid at the review stage, the Supreme Court refused to intervene in the circumstances as the present case was misrepresentation, unread or misinterpretation of the evidence. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer