Find a Lawyer

SALMA BIBI versus STATE

Section 302/34 evidence was credited to the police and an FIR was lodged on the very next day, with a delay of 20 hours when the police station was eighteen kilometers away, including three complainants. From, who was the victim's brother, said the complainant could not be produced during the trial because he was killed. The other eye witness was left at the hands of the prosecution, the third witness was the only witness of the witness who was the deceased's brother, but he was not a resident, about fifteen miles from the location and where the incident took place. There was a dispute between the medical evidence and the account of the accountant, the co-accused was the servant of one of the deceased and his role was to keep the woman dead in Japan when the accused opened fire on the woman. This was an unusual story because in the unlikely event that the co-accused could even hurt his person role, the co-accused was also unnatural and the recovery of the unforgivable crime took place two days later. The pistol and the vacant were sent to the forensic scientist for ten days for rehabilitation. Later, the crime fired by the pistol could not be cleared. There was no possible prosecution witness presence at the scene, a case against both the suspects was suspected and The benefit of the case should go to the trial of the accused under which the accused was convicted and sentenced, set aside and the accused acquitted. us immigration advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer