Find a Lawyer

FACTORY MANAGER, BUREWALA TEXTILE MILLS versus ASGHAR ALI

Section 15 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Sections 141 and AXXIII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Constitutional Requests Short Payment of Salary / Liability, Claim Deletion of Request at Proof The petitioner's statement for not following the case sought the petitioner's re-hearing on the case that due to some dispute with his lawyer regarding the fees, he could not pursue his case authority when the employer after the hearing. Restored the case in the interest of Justice HC. The order employer argued in the constitutional petition that it was finally decided that the withdrawal cases could not be restored by the authority due to the fact that the function had become official. And this is a breach of the clause O XXIII, R 1, CPC. He could not take any exception to the conclusions reached by the authority and was agreed upon by the High Court, under which the provisions of O XXIII, R 1, CPC were rendered fairly fair. Given the strange circumstances of such cases, it could not be applied: No prejudice was at stake: Due to the employer, who had already filed a written statement, the Supreme Court had resolved disputes according to the law. And preferred in the light of preferential evidence. There was no question of public importance law by the parties ask a advocate free from Tharparkar lawyer