Find a Lawyer

KHAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OKARA AND OTHERS

Section 68 Constitution of Pakistan (19731, Article 185 (3)) after hearing and conducting inquiries by the Divisional Canal Officer, after the approval of the new internal water reservoir, the appellate authority dismissed the civil suit challenging such orders. Had been approved for three years before the plaintiff's confession has been finalized, therefore, any alteration or amendment can only be made by a civil court order and not by the canal authorities and the canal. In view of section 68 (6) of the Drainage Act, 1873, the legitimate plaintiff had raised no objection to the civil court. Or the appellate court that the Canal Authorities did not have the authority to approve such orders High Court upheld the plaintiff's refusal to allow the plaintiff to take up new land for the first time at the confirmation stage. Canal officials heard the plaintiff and others After such orders were approved. The merit was decided on the basis of the evidence supported by the parties; no justice was aborted. In either case, the Supreme Court either rejected the appeal and refused leave to appeal. immigration advocates email from Gari Mori lawyer