Find a Lawyer

JAVED RIAZ versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL

Articles 199, 4 and 5 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24, a constitutional application for the acquisition of land was the position of the applicant since the acquisition of the land was done by the collector in the first period of the High Court. In violation of the law. Without the litigation and the satisfaction of his mind, the law was not sustainable in the eyes of the law and when the documents attached to this petition presented the justification, it was clear that the Land Acquisition Collector had disputed the parties without a court request. Has decided. Without prejudice to the mind and the means, for example, explaining the reasons for an action or order was a key to good governance. The Superior Court always emphasized the need to disclose the cause in support of that order. It was not in accordance with the law to follow the directions of the High Court in the constitutional petition before the documents were removed and without any reasoning and withholding passed and the order of section 24A, General Clause Act, 1897 The jurisdiction was set aside by the High Court. advocate for immigration from Tobatek Singh lawyer