Find a Lawyer

MUSA KHAN versus DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT CUSTOMS (ASO), SARGODHA

Section 196 General Charter No. 1781/95 Dated 25 11 1995 Section RO No. 506 (I) / 88 Dated 26 6 1988 Exemption No. 10684 Appealed to the High Court from the Foreign Ministry The fact is that the sale of the vehicle was imported free of charge. ? The customs duty of a foreign diplomatic tribunal as well as the adjusting officer found that the undercarriage vehicle had been disposed of / sold to someone who is said to have appeared in the petition. Owner of vehicle and ready to pay all customs duty and other taxes on the said vehicle Syed Person Adjudicating Officer did not challenge the record order which shows that diplomatic status of duty / tax free vehicles importer 4 1995 was discontinued from 1995 and its associated privileges terminated with it and, thus, the Appellant / Ex. It says it will continue to remain in the artkar Pakistan, its importance will end, it is one of the extraordinary excesses. The e-hospitality section 196, under the Customs Act, 1969, was extended to the jurisdiction of the foreign diplomat requested by the appellant (former diplomat), which was limited to dealing only with questions of law and in this case Appellant's arguments raised a factual dispute. Out of the jurisdiction and jurisdiction of Section 196, the Appeal of the Customs Act 1969 was dismissed in the circumstances famous supreme court advocate from Abdul Hakim lawyer