Find a Lawyer

FAIZ MUHAMMAD versus ZAFAR AHMAD

Section 15 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), Sections 34 (2) and 35 (1) of the pre-emption suit were remanded by the Appellate Court after the judgment of 6 12 1982 in a post-remand proceeding after a new decision. The suit was dismissed by the trial court of 1987, but the appellate court dismissed their order on 17 2 1991. The high court dismissed the petition filed by the defendant Val Jawal Rule in Syed Kamal's case. In which the order of PLD 1986 SC 360 would have no effect, which was present on 6. 12 Once approved in favor of a pre-emptor in 1982, it will come to the same rule, even if the appellate court has rendered a case before 31 7 198 1987, before the trial again. The present case for arraignment was pending, under which the order could be passed in accordance with the qualifying provisions. As per the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (1913), it has not been repealed but the decision made pursuant to the law laid down by the Supreme Court has not been nullified. The Supreme Court did not guarantee interference \ r \ n \ r \ n law firms from Wana lawyer