Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324, 392, 395, 411, 412, 224, 225, 353, 34, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (a) (c) in addition to the definition of evidence The accused, who is alleged to have been transported by means of weapons and weapons, was present in the police van at the time of the incident, as the prisoner in his trial was not denied incident and the injured prosecutor. There was no enmity between the witnesses, who were police officers, and the suspect, who was excluded from the possibility of being held prisoner at the trial, which is otherwise an unusual occurrence. It was not necessary to take advantage of the principle that the accused should kick the benefit of the doubt, where it was not applicable to this case, after considering all the evidence, the court was convinced beyond reasonable. While the prosecution's case is acceptable behavior in which the recovery of the accused was impacted, it should not be surprising given the strange circumstances of the prosecution's story with the uncontrollable offenders. The red natural, truthful and understandable and hollow account made it an understandable reason to believe that the suspects in the police van were also witnesses to the incident and were advancing their case of various possibilities. The prosecution had completely settled its case as a record factual record. , The appeal filed by the accused against the trial court judge was dismissed ask a advocate free from Ubaro lawyer