Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT, SUB-INSPECTOR M/7- versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

R13 1 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) The public employee's publicity complaint was that they were not verified because the inspector was employed as a public servant. It was not because he was awarded seven censorship convictions and was also fined Rs 4000 / - The department authority confiscated the government employee's service for six years, six months in 1996 and for one month a year, Government employee integrity was also found. Not controversial in its annual secret report of 1986, the Service Tribunal did not find the civil servant fit for development and the appeal was dismissed. Government employees were not found to be appropriate and appropriate as a Inspector in accordance with R13 1 of the Police Rules and appropriate for promotion and certification. , 1934 The final findings of fact filed by the Departmental Authority and the Service Tribunal did not demand any intervention by the Supreme Court, which was denied appeal. immigration advocates email from Sukkur lawyer