Find a Lawyer

ALI MUHAMMAD versus STATE

In accordance with Section 426 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 324 of the Penalty Prosecution, the applicant was charged with the effective firing of the deceased and four injured witnesses, two of whom were acquitted in the trial. Were During the trial, the trial court correctly found that the prosecution had successfully proved the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt, although some of the accomplices, although acquitted by the trial court, were acquitted. It is believed that the case of the acquitted partner was related to the case against the applicant. Since no weapons were recovered from the possession of the alleged accomplices, a firearm was recovered from the possession of the applicant during the investigation while the evidence presented by the applicant regarding the merits of the case must be considered. Which cannot be practiced by the High Court. The sentence filed by the petitioner at such an adult stage was suspended attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gilgit lawyer